Sunday, March 8, 2009

Morality

I have only read one graphic novel before (Max Allan Collin's "Road to Perdition") and generally avoid them. But I became quite intrigued with the "Watchmen" after seeing previews for the new movie. So I decided to wade into the uber-violent and crass world of graphic novels once again to see what I could learn. It is the most acclaimed graphic novel of all time and one of Time Magazine's 100 best novels of all time. The storytelling is absolutely gripping and I am hooked. Thus far, the biggest theme of the book is morality. The author takes the premise of superheroes and uses it to ask questions about society and the morality of decisions our government makes. The different characters individually carry the set of characteristic of certain groups of people seen in the government, and as you watch them make moral decisions on a personal level, you see the bigger picture of what it would mean for the group of people in real life in government who make such decisions. Does that make sense? It is late and I need to get to bed. But during the pauses between my reading over the weekend, I have been pondering our government and the fact that they are MORALLY BANKRUPT. It is about time we sat down and had a real discussion about the (at the very least) questionably morality of their decisions. For example:

What is the morality of an outspoken pro-life politician (Sam Brownback) supporting a radically pro-choice pick for Sec of Health & Human services just because it will make it easier for him to win the governorship of his state in a couple years? What is the morality of our country saying they oppose torture and then using the Rendition program to send prisoners out to Egypt or other countries to be tortured so we don't have to do it ourselves? What is the morality in congressmen owning stock in certian companies and then awarding those same companies huge subsidies or mandating use of their products? (Think curly light bulbs) What is the morality of a tax cheat heading the congressional committee that writes the tax code and a tax cheat being nominated and confirmed to head the IRS? What is the morality of those same two individuals getting together and having a public discussion about the need to increase penalties on tax cheats! What is the morality of no-bid defense contracts with huge companies? What is the morality of our government passing a BAILOUT or SAVE THE ECONOMY bill that has THOUSANDS of non-stimulus related earmarks? Or what about the TARP program where we were told the money was going to be used to buy bad debt (a bad decision, mind you) and then once the money was authorized, use it to buy into huge corporations! Where is the morality in the government cozying up to mega-businesses and sacrificing small businesses and individuals? Where is the morality in a man defending his family in his own home with a gun and then being thrown in jail for it? What is the morality of our government telling us that they are doing one thing, while at the same time doing something entirely un-related behind our back? What is the morality of the government funding the destruction of frozen human embryos for research? What is the morality of politicians railing against smoking and then using the money from cigarrette taxes to fund our school system? What is the morality of the belief that anything is OK as long as it is for the greater good? What kind of moral code guides a modern progressive to go on and on about peace and rail against war while wearing a Che shirt? What about our government making up the problem of Global Warming so they can gain more control over our lives and businesses? What is the moral code that allows Michael Steele to suck up to Rush Limbaugh and then in a different situations dismiss him as "ugly" and "incindiery"? How can the Republican party say they are fighting for fiscal responsibility while being responsible for half the earmarks in congress?

The list goes on.

Ugh.

Who is willing to have this discussion?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

As I said before, morals without God is not morals, it is borderline hypocrisy. And let me say something before being called a liberal or somethingike that: of all people that sin in this world, I'm the worst. I can't believe that God loves me dearly, b/c I don't deserve anything from Him but hell.

Morals that are not based in the bible are not morals, they are hypocrisy; that's why we get frustrated when we see this politically correct BS world that we live in today.

It is the same thing with gay marriage, pornography, abortion, stem cell research and "the saving the american family" ideas that Christians have. We want non-Christians to make moral decisions, because we want to save the American family values and morals, but we do so in a very hipocytical way. We condemn abortion without giving an alternative, we condemn gay marriage without really evangelizing and bringing the gospel to homossexuals and we don't have a clue that there's an alternative to stem cell research, wich is something very important to the medicine. We can make these researches throught the placenta of a new born, and even through blood donations. The problem is that Christians are so against it, that they are not helping with the process that could ban the use of frozen embryos and tshift it towards blood donationations and even the use of the medula.

That brings me back to the bible; we all sinned, we are all corrupt, and none of us deserves redemption. Righteousness is not aquired through morals, but through Christ. He is the only one that can turn a pro chioce into a pro life, the only one that can help us in our daily lives and struggles, and the only one that can bring a moral change to a corrupt heart. The imorality of a non-Christian does not make me mad nor surprizes me, as a matter of a fact, that's what I expect from them. We as Christians have the obligation to teach Christ more than fight for morals, b/c Christ will bring moral to the life of a Christian. Hebrews chapter 12 makes a clear distinction on how God teaches non believers and Christians. God will break a Christian down at some point, and that can be very hurtfull, but at the same time brings righteousness, and that can be connected to high moral standards. On the other side, if God takes His hands from you, you'll be left with the desires of your flesh, and then morals will not be a concern to you. That's the main difference between Christians and non christians. GOD